A Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) study has found that deficits in the sense of smell are important contributors to the frequently observed lack of appetite in patients with serious kidney disease. In their report in the Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, the research team describes finding olfactory abnormalities in around 70 percent of patients with chronic kidney disease and 90 percent of those with end-stage renal disease and that more significant deficits were associated with factors indicating poor nutrition. A proof-of-concept trial of a potential treatment for these olfactory deficits had promising results.
“The majority of patients with chronic kidney disease, particularly those in the more advanced stages who require dialysis, exhibited some degree of loss of their sense of smell, which correlated with reduced nutritional status,” says Teodor Păunescu, PhD, of the MGH Division of Nephrology, corresponding author of the study. “Malnutrition is a well-known complication of chronic and end-stage kidney disease, so identifying contributing factors is important to devising potential therapies.”
First author Sagar Nigwekar, MD, also of MGH Nephrology, explains, “More than 25 million adults in the U.S. have chronic kidney disease, with more than half a million requiring dialysis. Poor dietary intake leading to malnutrition is common in these patients, but there currently are no effective treatments addressing these complications. Establishing what these olfactory deficits are and how they influence patient nutrition is essential for the development of novel preventive or therapeutic interventions.”
Kidney disease patients often lose their interest in food, reporting that it has little flavor or an unpleasant taste, and the malnutrition that results is a significant contributor to worsening of symptoms and mortality risk. Although several studies have reported impaired olfactory ability in kidney disease patients, others have had mixed results, and none have been the kind of large-scale assessment that could characterize how specific abnormalities influence nutritional status. As a result, even though the sense of smell has a major contribution to the flavors of foods, most efforts to increase food intake in kidney disease patients have focused on the sense of taste and direct appetite stimulation.
The current study enrolled 161 participants – 100 with end-stage kidney disease, all of whom were dialysis dependent; 36 with chronic disease not yet at the end stage, and 25 healthy controls. One test – the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification test – determined participants’ ability to identify specific odors. Another test analyzed the level of an aroma that was required for detection by individual participants. Testing both for odor identification and got the odor detection threshold could determine whether abnormalities could be traced to olfactory neurons in the nasal passages or to the odor processing pathways in the brain.
Based on the odor identification tests, 69 percent of those with chronic kidney disease and 92 percent of those with end-stage disease had a significant reduction in their sense of smell. In the test determining odor detection thresholds, participants with end-stage kidney disease required a four times greater concentration of an aroma to be detected than did either those with chronic disease or control participants.
Despite the significant differences in olfactory ability between the three groups of participants, in all three participants’ ratings of their own sense of smell averaged about 80 percent on a scale of 0 to 100 percent, suggesting that most patients were not aware of having problems with their sense of smell. In all three groups, participants’ nutritional status – determined by a standard assessment of food intake, weight changes and gastrointestinal symptoms, along with measures of factors such as cholesterol and albumin, which reflects protein metabolism – correlated with their olfactory abilities.
To test a potential treatment for these olfactory deficits, the team enrolled seven dialysis-dependent, end-stage kidney disease patients in a pilot study of theophylline – a drug approved to treat asthma and emphysema and previously reported to reduce such deficits in patients without kidney disease. Participants self-administered daily intranasal doses of theophylline for six weeks and had follow-up tests every two weeks during the study period.
While the odor identification scores of two participants deteriorated, for the other five they increased an average of 5 percent, with the greatest improvement in any participant exceeding 10 percent, compared with scores at the trial outset. For three participants, the improvement was enough to move them up one category, such as from severe to moderate loss of smell or from moderate to mild.
“We were very excited to find that the three patients in whom the odor detection threshold was improved by more than 10 percent after theophylline treatment were also the top three in terms of odor identification improvement,” says Păunescu. “We know that in the general population olfactory deficits reduce the enjoyment of food and are risk factors for malnutrition, so the use of novel therapeutics to improve olfaction could be an innovative and effective way to prevent and alleviate malnutrition in kidney disease patients.”
Nigwekar adds, “We’re now planning to expand the investigation of olfactory deficits to a larger group of patients and determine whether or not poor dietary intake truly drives the association between olfactory deficits and nutritional quality. A longer-term study should help us establish the sequence of events by which olfactory deficits lead to changes in food consumption and eventual malnutrition, and the encouraging preliminary findings of the theophylline trial warrant confirmation in a larger study.” Both investigators are assistant professors of Medicine at Harvard Medical School.
Additional co-authors of the Journal of the American Society of Nephrology report are Jeremy Weiser, Sahir Kalim, MD, Dihua Xu, PhD, Joshua Wibecan, Sarah Dougherty, Laurence Mercier-Lafond, Kristin Corapi, MD, Nwamaka Eneanya, MD, Dennis Brown, PhD, and Ravi Thadhani, MD, MGH Nephrology; and Eric Holbrook, MD, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary. Support for the study includes a Leslie Fang Translational Research Award from the MGH Division of Nephrology and support from Harvard Catalyst/The Harvard Clinical and Translational Science Center (National Center for Research Resources and National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, NIH Award UL1 TR001102).
Massachusetts General Hospital, founded in 1811, is the original and largest teaching hospital of Harvard Medical School. The MGH Research Institute conducts the largest hospital-based research program in the nation, with an annual research budget of more than $800 million and major research centers in HIV/AIDS, cardiovascular research, cancer, computational and integrative biology, cutaneous biology, genomic medicine, medical imaging, neurodegenerative disorders, regenerative medicine, reproductive biology, systems biology, photomedicine and transplantation biology. The MGH topped the 2015 Nature Index list of health care organizations publishing in leading scientific journals and earned the prestigious 2015 Foster G. McGaw Prize for Excellence in Community Service. In August 2016 the MGH was once again named to the Honor Roll in the U.S. News & World Report list of "America’s Best Hospitals.”
Media contact: Julie Cunningham, email@example.com, 617 724-6433