Simple blood test may be
able to predict risk of preeclampsia
BOSTON April 4, 2002 A simple blood test conducted
during the first trimester of pregnancy may be able to identify women
at risk for preeclampsia, a common and dangerous complication of late
pregnancy, say researchers from the Massachusetts General Hospital
(MGH). The prospective study found that women who eventually developed
preeclampsia, which is also called toxemia, were more likely to have
had reduced blood levels of a protein called SHBG, a known marker
for insulin resistance, early in pregnancy. The report appears in
the April issue of The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism.
"This study showed that a risk factor that can be detected
many weeks before symptoms appear may be able to predict who will
develop preeclampsia," says Myles Wolf, MD, of the MGH Renal
Unit, the paper's first author. "Our study raises the possibility
of developing new approaches to diagnosis and intervention, which
eventually could lead to preventive treatments."
"Preeclampsia can be devastating, and unfortunately we do
not have a way to treat women with this condition," says author
Ravi Thadhani, MD, MPH, of the MGH Renal Unit, the study's senior
author. "Finding a way to predict who will develop preeclampsia
is a necessary first step to testing new therapies."
Preeclampsia is a condition in which a pregnant woman develops
high blood pressure and other metabolic abnormalities. If not appropriately
managed, a woman with preeclampsia can proceed to eclampsia - characterized
by seizures - or liver or kidney failure, complications that can
prove fatal. Preeclampsia increases the risk of premature delivery
or emergency cesarean, since delivery is the only real cure for
the condition. In such instances, the baby faces the numerous risks
associated with prematurity.
It is estimated that preeclampsia occurs in 5 to 7 percent of pregnancies
(more than 200,000 women in the U.S. every year) and is more common
in women having their first pregnancy. While preexisting diabetes
and high blood pressure have been identified as risk factors, standard
treatments for those conditions have not been effective in reducing
the risk.
The current study is part of the MGH Obstetrical Maternal Study,
a prospective study of more than 4,500 women that seeks to identify
risk factors for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. As part of
that larger study, blood samples are taken from participants during
the first trimester. The current report's investigators reviewed
information from study participants who delivered single children
in their first pregnancy and identified 45 cases of preeclampsia.
They compared data on those women with information from 90 study
participants randomly selected from those who had normal pregnancies,
with particular attention to factors known to be associated with
insulin resistance syndrome. Several of the symptoms of insulin
resistance - including obesity and hypertension - are also associated
with preeclampsia.
Those women who went on to develop preeclampsia were found to have
had reduced levels of the protein SHBG (sex hormone binding globulin)
in their first-trimester blood tests much more frequently than were
women who had normal pregnancies. The researchers also found that
the association of reduced SHBG levels with the risk of preeclampsia
remained no matter whether women were lean or overweight.
"We know that obese women are at higher risk for preeclampsia
and tend to have insulin resistance," Wolf says. "The
fact that the association of preeclampsia with reduced first-trimester
SHBG is also seen in lean women suggests that insulin resistance
may be the true risk factor. It also may provide the only clue that
a lean woman is at elevated risk."
Wolf adds that the possibility of being able to identify at-risk
women earlier in their pregnancies could lead to advances in the
search for preventive therapies. "One reason why the studies
of possible treatments have failed could be that we can't predict
who might develop preeclampsia until symptoms begin, which can be
20 to 25 weeks into pregnancy. There might be a window of opportunity
in the first trimester when preventive treatment could be successful,
but until now we did not have a simple way to identify high-risk
women."
Along with Thadhani, who is principal investigator of the MGH Obstetrical
Maternal Study, Wolf's coauthors are Laura Sandler, Kristine Munoz
and Karen Hsu of the MGH Renal Unit, and Jeffrey Ecker, MD, of the
MGH/Vincent Obstetrics and Gynecology Service. The study was supported
by grants from the National Institutes of Health.
Massachusetts General Hospital, established in 1811, is the original
and largest teaching hospital of Harvard Medical School. The MGH
conducts the largest hospital-based research program in the United
States, with an annual research budget of more than $300 million
and major research centers in AIDS, cardiovascular research, cancer,
cutaneous biology, transplantation biology and photomedicine.
In 1994, the MGH joined with Brigham and Women's Hospital to form
Partners HealthCare System, an integrated health care delivery system
comprising the two academic medical centers, specialty and community
hospitals, a network of physician groups and nonacute and home health
services.
Media Contact: Sue
McGreevey , MGH Public Affairs
Physician Referral Service: 1-800-388-4644
Information
about Clinical Trials
|
|
 |