But even when it lost its reputation, it was still ahead of the curve. Certainly when I was in college and medical school, it was ahead of other places. The first blacks at HMS finished before the Civil War, [and] there were females at HMS in the 1940s. So the city—the university specifically but also the city generally—has been a bastion of liberality. Social action groups are commonplace here, maybe more than some parts of the country. Academia was included in that it was never permissible to be hurtful or even mean-spirited.
What was the atmosphere within the psychiatry department specifically when you came?
They were making a conscious effort at that time…to be more diverse. Leon Eisenberg was the chairperson. He himself was an extreme liberal…and so he brought in blacks and women, and he fought hard in the medical school to bring more students of color. As with all of these things, I think you have to have some advocates who put a lot on the line from their own personal resources. [Eisenberg] talked about [these issues] all the time, fought for them in conferences, and brought in people to back up his feelings. Certainly there have been other places that had female residents and black residents, but he made a more dedicated effort and had probably more people [of diverse backgrounds] at the same time and at different ranks. He had residents and faculty and he had staff people, secretaries in the wards and such.
Could you tell us about your own experience as a minority?
[Growing up] in the ’30s, I was taught to be prepared for things that I had never seen. Compared to, say, a black man who’s now 25, I thought much more about my color and limitations it would bring me than he would. And [that] might be a good or bad thing. I can remember there were periods of my life when I probably couldn’t go 20 minutes without thinking something about my race. …It never left me. I was always aware of limitations and dangers it posed.
Negotiating as a black in a white world would obviously take lots of adjustment and accommodation. And there must be so many things I do naturally, borne out of experience that I couldn’t elaborate, because from the time I can remember, I’ve always been a black minority person surrounded by mainly whites. And I was taught lots of things to prepare for the evils of a white world. There are advantages to being colored. I’ve seen many. And I know that a lot of blacks feel like I do, how glad we are that we’re black, because we have a cause to live for. We’ve always had things to fight for; we had a culture which is widely imitated. Others want to be like us. …[But] I think it might be a false position to underappreciate the fact that you still recognized as a demeaned member of a social class. If you don’t recognize it and understand it, you’d be in for surprises. The world isn’t quite that good yet that a person won’t have some nasty things happen to him [because of his race].
I wonder whether it’s good or bad [consciousness of race]. Some of the things I was taught probably wouldn’t be wise to teach people now. But on the other hand, some [of them] might be—I don’t know. A child of today might think it’s very strange to talk about interracial marriage, because all around we see more and more of it. It’s always been going on, but much more so now than in 1930, and it is accepted with less comment. So with a child growing up today, is it even necessary to talk about it? If you do talk about it, you might be doing [that child] a disservice, because the different set of circumstances under which he lives. He couldn’t see the way I could in the 1930s the disadvantages that the child of an interracial couple would have. So if you talk about [interracial marriage], are you perpetuating something that’s not necessary? But if you don’t talk about it, are you making him less prepared for the existence at some level, even unconscious, of the fact that he’s probably not going to be treated with the same equality as a white in any given situation?
How does the department now compare to the department then in terms of diversity?
There are certainly more black females and certainly more women now, but of course there are more women in the profession in general and specifically in psychiatry. But there hasn’t been a great influx. People have other opportunities, so there still haven’t been very many blacks at the professional level who have finished [training] or who want to come here [for training]. I don’t know about Latinos and Asians.
About Diversity Dialogues
Diversity Dialogues are an ongoing series of shared experiences presented by the Center for Diversity. The blog was co-founded and is co-edited by Doctors Trina Chang, Tristan Gorrindo and Ranna Parekh.
[There is] a wider and more sincere acceptance of difference [now]. I think, as with everything, people get used to it. They don’t know what the previous history has been. What they’re seeing is how they think it’s [always] been. It certainly is different now. Nobody’s surprised to say they have a chief who’s female or if someone announces that he or she is gay. [For] a little girl in kindergarten now, it won’t be anything to go to the wedding of a same-sex couple.
By any definition, this has been a very welcoming place [for me]. I haven’t had any negative experiences or feelings that I was underappreciated or overworked. So for me, it’s been a blessing to work here. I didn’t feel any direct barriers that prevented me from doing things. All the leaders in the department since I’ve been here have been aware of these [diversity] issues and fair-minded and progressive about them, and that’s saying a great deal.
How can the difficulty of recruiting blacks to the department be addressed?
In any kind of professional academic endeavor, the pool [of blacks] is very small. I would hope that the numbers [in the department] would begin to reflect the ratio in the population between whites and coloreds. That’s a long way from what has happened. There hasn’t been much progress even in a place like this. [But] that’s not this hospital’s fault. It’s a social issue.
I don’t know what the department can do [on that level]. They can’t make black grade schools better. Kids are going to be beset by problems of hunger or broken homes. You want to give hope, but on the other hand, you might make unrealistic hopes, and that might not be a positive. I know a lot of blacks who think that the important thing is to get as much education as you can get. But for some kids, to ask them to think about going to college, it’s as likely they can do it as going to Mars. It’s a societal problem. In some ways I guess society has done well considering what it’s up against. Still, that’s what I would feel would be the goal, when a colored person wouldn’t have to give any thought to the color of his skin.
What do you think the diversity center can or should do?
I think you have to have a realistic goal. You put a brick in the wall, but you don’t put up the whole wall yourself. Right now almost anything that’s done would be a gain. I would hope the center would get a lot of research done about the origins and the effects of the negative aspects of diversity: unconscious actions that define lots of colored-to-white interaction and that make life more difficult—and I think shorter—for coloreds. I don’t know if the diversity center can do anything [to directly reduce those effects], but it can raise consciousness.
Dr. Chester Pierce is Professor Emeritus of Psychiatry at Harvard Medical School and Professor Emeritus of Education at Harvard University as well as a Senior Psychiatrist at Massachusetts General Hospital, where he is Senior Consultant to the Department of Psychiatry's Center for Diversity.
He is the Past President of the American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology and the American Orthopsychiatric Association, a member of The Carter Center Mental Health Task Force from 2001 to 2004, and founding president of the Black Psychiatrists of America.
He has published more than 180 books, articles, and reviews, primarily on extreme environments, racism, media, and sports medicine, and organized a groundbreaking "African Diaspora" conference to bring together psychiatrists of African descent to discuss common issues and challenges. Dr. Pierce received his bachelor’s degree from Harvard College and his medical degree from Harvard Medical School.
Jerrold F. Rosenbaum, M.D.
Chief, Dept. of Psychiatry
May 20, 2012
George Engel’s 1977 paper in Science challenged medicine to start thinking about patients as more than just a disease. In coining the term “the biopsychosocial model”, Engel put words to what the field of psychiatry has long felt to be central to treating disease that is, it is hard to fully appreciate a patient’s symptoms unless a doctor also understands the social and developmental context in which a patient works, plays, and lives. This idea of treating the whole patient is a cornerstone in modern psychiatry.
As a field that values an understanding of the economic, social, and political environments from which our patients come to us, we also value the diversity and richness of ideas of our own faculty and staff. In appreciating and respecting the diverse backgrounds of our patients, we also appreciate and respect our own backgrounds.
In 2011, we surveyed the faculty within the Department of Psychiatry about diversity. Of the almost 400 people who completed the survey (40% of the department), we learned that:
For the last 15 years, the Department’s diversity initiatives have been spearheaded by our diversity committee, which has been a model for others within the hospital and community. The committee’s milestone achievements have included speaker series, “Diversity Dialogues,” diversity surveys, and consultations to outside organizations. Indeed, our diversity committee has become a template for other diversity efforts in departments throughout the hospital.
I am delighted to announce the transformation of our Department’s Diversity Committee into the new Center for Diversity. The focus of our new Center will expand on the previous mission of the committee and include intercultural education, mental health disparities research, and collaborations throughout the hospital and community.
We are quite proud of the diversity seen within our department, but we cannot rest on our laurels. For as diverse as we are, we continue to strive to bring and retain faculty and staff from all backgrounds into our department with the hope that our own diversity will begin to match the diverse backgrounds of those we serve. Recognizing and appreciating diversity is very much part of our everyday work, not a marginal issue that should be treated as something unusual.