|

August
22, 2003
|
Advances
Study finds many IRB members have ties to industry
A study from the MGH Institute of Health Policy has found that a significant
percentage of faculty members who serve on institutional review boards
(IRBs) at medical schools and teaching hospitals across the nation also
act as consultants to the pharmaceutical industry. The study, published
in the journal Academic Medicine, provides the first analysis of the personal,
professional and research characteristics of IRB members.
All institutions conducting medical research with human participants must
establish an IRB to review proposed studies for compliance with ethical
standards and scientific principles. Faculty members serving on IRBs provide
the boards research expertise and may guide their activities. In recent
years, IRBs have come under criticism for not sufficiently protecting
research participants, with some charging that board members may not have
enough experience or may be influenced by industrial ties.
The survey of almost 3,000 faculty members at 125 U.S. medical schools
found that 47 percent of respondents who were active researchers had served
as consultants to industry during the previous three years. "Our
previous research has shown that faculty ties to industry can affect scientific
behavior, leading to such things as trade secrecy and delays in publishing
research," says Eric G. Campbell, PhD, lead author of the study.
"It's possible that similar relationships with companies could affect
IRB members' activities and attitudes, although our current study did
not directly address this issue."
Study co-author Joel Weissman, PhD, adds: "It is important to note
that clinical research experience and relationships with industry can
benefit IRBs, because these areas are fundamental considerations when
deciding on the appropriateness of a study. These benefits, however, must
be weighted against the potential risks."
Other co-authors of the study are Recai Yucel, PhD, Nancyanne Causino,
EdD, and David Blumenthal, MD, MPP, all of the MGH Institute of Health
Policy.
|