New research addresses ongoing concerns regarding risks of allergic reactions after receiving mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, particularly for individuals with a history of severe allergic reactions. The results provide reassurances of the vaccines’ safety.
- For critically ill adults with COVID-19, therapeutic anticoagulation should be reserved for those patients with a clear clinical indication, researchers recommend.
Hanny Al-Samkari, MD
In patients critically ill with COVID-19, therapeutic dose anticoagulation started early in the ICU stay was not associated with improved survival.
Division of Hematology/Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital
BOSTON – Although abnormal blood clotting has been identified as one of the primary causes of death from COVID-19, early treatment in an intensive care unit (ICU) with therapeutic anticoagulation (anti-clotting) for adults who are critically ill with COVID-19 does not appear to improve chances of survival, and could do more harm than good by increasing the risk for major bleeding, a multicenter research group cautions.
“In patients critically ill with COVID-19, therapeutic dose anticoagulation started early in the ICU stay was not associated with improved survival,”says Hanny Al-Samkari, MD, an investigator in the Division of Hematology/Oncology at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) and lead author of a study reporting the findings in the journal Annals of Internal Medicine. (Whereas such patients almost always receive low, “prophylactic dose” anticoagulation, therapeutic doses are much higher.)
Al-Samkari and colleagues at MGH, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, and Harvard Medical School (HMS) analyzed health records from STOP-COVID (Study of the Treatment and Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19), a multicenter study that included adults 18 and older who had laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 and were admitted to participating ICUs at 67 geographically diverse hospitals in the United States.
The researchers evaluated the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE), a serious and potentially fatal blood clotting event, as well as the occurrence of major, life-threatening bleeding. They also examined the effects of early therapeutic anticoagulation on survival.
To do this, they used data from the study to simulate a randomized clinical trial in which patients are randomly assigned to receive or not receive therapeutic anticoagulation within two days of being admitted to an ICU. The model took into account detailed data on demographics, comorbidities, medications and severity of illness that might otherwise influence the results.
They found that 6.3% of the 3,239 patients had VTE confirmed on imaging studies and 2.8% had major bleeding events. The incidence of VTE was considerably less frequent than in previous, mostly smaller studies of patients with COVID-19, which reported VTE rates as high as 42%.
The only factors that accurately predicted higher risk for VTE were male sex and higher circulating levels of D-dimer, a protein fragment produced when a blood clot breaks up.
Importantly, the results showed that there was no survival benefit for patients who received therapeutic anticoagulation in the first two days of an ICU stay compared with patients who did not receive early therapeutic anticoagulation.
“We looked at multiple subgroups of patients, including by age, sex and severity of illness, and we did not find any subgroup that benefited from early therapeutic anticoagulation,” says senior author and principal investigator of STOP-COVID, David E. Leaf, MD, MMSc, director of clinical and translational research in acute kidney injury in the Division of Renal Medicine at the Brigham.
The study results also reinforce that “bleeding matters. Bleeding is not trivial in these patients,” Al-Samkari says. Of the 90 patients who had a major bleeding event in the study, 60 were receiving therapeutic anticoagulation at the time of the event, and 56 of the 90 patients (62%) with a major bleed died within 28 days. The most common sites of bleeding were in the gastrointestinal tract and within the skull.
In addition to the clinical findings, the study results support the use of target trial emulation, the type of simulation the researchers used, to quickly acquire information that can be used to improve clinical care in a rapidly changing environment, says co-first author Shruti Gupta, MD, MPH, from the Division of Renal Medicine at the Brigham.
“This is another example of how target trial emulation, which we’ve used in other important studies from our STOP-COVID consortium, can be applied to observational data and allow us to estimate the effects of different treatments on clinical outcomes. This is particularly important because randomized clinical trials often take time and require large numbers of patients to see meaningful differences in outcomes,” she says.
Clinical staff at member institutions of the STOP-COVID consortium contributed data to the study. There was no outside funding source.
About the Massachusetts General Hospital
Massachusetts General Hospital, founded in 1811, is the original and largest teaching hospital of Harvard Medical School. The Mass General Research Institute conducts the largest hospital-based research program in the nation, with annual research operations of more than $1 billion and comprises more than 9,500 researchers working across more than 30 institutes, centers and departments. In August 2020, Mass General was named #6 in the U.S. News & World Report list of "America’s Best Hospitals."
About Brigham and Women’s Hospital
Brigham Health, a global leader in creating a healthier world, consists of Brigham and Women's Hospital, Brigham and Women’s Faulkner Hospital, the Brigham and Women’s Physicians Organization and many related facilities and programs. With more than 1,000 inpatient beds, approximately 60,000 inpatient stays and 1.7 million outpatient encounters annually, Brigham Health’s 1,200 physicians provide expert care in virtually every medical and surgical specialty to patients locally, regionally and around the world. An international leader in basic, clinical and translational research, Brigham Health has nearly 5,000 scientists, including physician-investigators, renowned biomedical researchers and faculty supported by over $700 million in funding. The Brigham’s medical preeminence dates back to 1832, and now, with 19,000 employees, that rich history is the foundation for its commitment to research, innovation, and community. Boston-based Brigham and Women’s Hospital is a teaching affiliate of Harvard Medical School and dedicated to educating and training the next generation of health care professionals. For more information, resources, and to follow us on social media, please visit http://www.brighamandwomens.org.
- Press Release
- Oct | 19 | 2021
Pregnant and lactating women should adhere closely to recommended COVID-19 vaccine schedules to attain full antibody protection
Certain antibody functions were delayed in pregnant and lactating women following the first dose. The second vaccine dose was critical to achieving full immunity in pregnant and lactating women.
- Press Release
- Oct | 19 | 2021
In pregnant women with COVID-19, sex of fetus may influence maternal and placental immune response and neonatal immune protection
The placentas of male and female fetuses respond very differently when a mother is infected with SARS-CoV-2 during pregnancy. Male placentas have significantly increased immune activation, and males receive significantly fewer anti-COVID antibodies from their mothers.
- Press Release
- Aug | 31 | 2021
Breathing humid and salt-enriched air reduces respiratory droplet generation; may contribute to the effectiveness of cotton masks and reduce incidence of and death by COVID-19 near seacoasts
Breathing water and salt suppresses the generation of respiratory droplets, and potentially reduces COVID-19 incidence and symptoms.
- Press Release
- Aug | 30 | 2021
Unsupervised AI breaks new ground by predicting the progression of COVID-19 and survival of patients directly from their chest CT images
A multi-center study showed that unsupervised deep learning based on computed tomography can provide a significantly higher prognostic performance than established laboratory tests and existing image-based visual and quantitative survival predictors